The Siemon Law Firm
Honest Answers.
View Practice Areas

New Question in Baby Vanessa Child Custody Case

Last week, we wrote about the legal issues highlighted by the tragic Baby Vanessa case. In this case, two-year-old Vanessa of California is being forced to leave the only parent she has ever known -- her adoptive mother -- and move to Ohio to live with her biological father, whom she has never known.

This child custody case highlights the real challenges family law faces when balancing a father's rights and the best interest of a child.

The reason Baby Vanessa is being uprooted from her home is that her father, Benjamin Mills, Jr., never consented to her adoption. When she put Vanessa up for adoption, the biological mother lied under oath about his identity.

A parent's right to raise his or her child is considered fundamental and can't be taken away except when a court of law finds the parent to be unfit. No such finding has been made against Mr. Mills. Finding the adoption void two years after the fact, the courts have ordered that Vanessa be given over to Mills.

New information in the case brings up additional questions about the balance of Vanessa's father's rights and her best interests.

In a statement released by his attorney today, Mills will not personally take custody of Vanessa. Instead, his mother, who has legal custody of two others of Mills's children, will raise Vanessa.

Does It Matter Whether Mills or His Mother Has Child Custody?

Situations where a biological father is denied the right to consent to or refuse an adoption are more common than you might expect. While they are unusual enough to make national news, courts and legal scholars have had time to consider the issue. This area of the law is quite unsettled, with passionate opinions on both sides.

Over the past few decades, family courts nationwide have been moving toward making decisions that affect children on the basis of what is in the child's best interest. The exception is when a parent's fundamental rights are concerned.

Whether you believe the law should place a greater weight on the best interest of the child or on the parent's rights, the fact that Mills would not be directly raising Vanessa brings an additional layer of complexity to the case.

The fundamental right here is Benjamin Mills's fundamental right to child custody, or to a relationship with his child. However, Mills will apparently not personally have custody of Vanessa.

Mills's attorney says that Mills wants to build a relationship with Vanessa and to have her bond with her family. Those are very likely considered part of Mills's fundamental rights as a parent, just as his right to raise her would be. Does the fact that Mills will not personally raise Vanessa change the way you would balance things?

Whether this new information will have any impact on the courts' decision remains to be seen.

Related Resource:

"Baby Vanessa: Mills wants his mom to raise girl" (Dayton Daily News, July 26, 2010)

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
Contact our Georgia Family Law Firm by calling 770-888-5120 or by completing this contact form. An attorney will respond within 24 business hours.

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

The Siemon Law Firm
347 Dahlonega Street, Building 100
Cumming, GA 30040

Phone: 770-888-5120
Cumming Law Office Map

The Siemon Law Firm
4555 Mansell Road, Suite 300
Alpharetta, GA 30022

Phone: 770-888-5093
Alpharetta Law Office Map

The Siemon Law Firm
3400 Peachtree Rd NE, Suite 555
Atlanta, GA 30326

Phone: 770-888-5078
Atlanta Law Office Map

The Siemon Law Firm
One Parkway Center
1850 Parkway Place
Suite 715
Marietta, GA 30067

Phone: 770-888-5312
Marietta Law Office Map